Back to Extension, training & tools

Improved Pasture Management Systems

Project start date: 01 January 2022
Project end date: 15 March 2025
Project status: In progress
Livestock species: Grass-fed Cattle, Sheep, Lamb
Relevant regions: South Australia, Mediterranean
Site location: Upper North Region, SA: Caltowie North, Pekina & Melrose

Summary

The producer demonstration site project aims to improve the pasture management systems implemented in the Upper North of South Australia through demonstrating:

  1. Better pasture options that improve the mixed farming enterprise, and

  2. That a better understanding of Food On Offer, including feed budgeting and the use of remote sensing pasture assessment tools will improve overall livestock productivity, enterprise profitability and farm sustainability.

 

Objectives

By January 2025, in the Upper North region of South Australia:

  1. Demonstrate three options for a mix of pasture/fodder species that can provide superior FOO measured by:

    • Improved liveweight growth of lambs

    • Improved CS of ewes

    • Improved biomass production

    • Improved ground cover

  2. Conduct an analysis of the cost:benefit of the trialed pasture mixes

  3. Adoption:

    • 60% of core/engaged producers will have adopted improved pasture mixes that have resulted in either an improved biomass production by 10% or groundcover over summer by 5% depending on the pasture mix and site objectives.

    • 10% of observers (measured from workshop and field day participants) will have adopted improved pasture mixes that have resulted in either an improved biomass production by 10% or groundcover over summer by 5% depending on the pasture mix and site objectives.

  4. Awareness, Knowledge and Skills:

    • 100% of core/engaged producers will have an improved understanding of pasture mixes, the role they play in improved biomass production and maintaining groundcover over summer and how to measure and manage them to improve livestock production outcomes.

    • 50% of observers (measured from workshop and field day participants) will have improved understanding of pasture mixes, the role they play in improved biomass production and maintaining groundcover over summer and how to measure and manage them to improve livestock production outcomes.

  5. Conduct ground truthing for Cibo Labs at 3 sites across the region on at least 6 different pasture types (3 sown mixed pastures (demonstrations), 3 single species or self-regenerating pastures (controls))

  6. Demonstrate the use of satellite pasture monitoring technology for feed budgeting and encourage adoption of the new technology by 6 producers

  7. Implement a series of training activities to increase producer understanding of assessing FOO and feed budgeting and encourage adoption of these practices by 25 producers

Progress

A Producer Demonstration Site was established near Caltowie North in SA aiming to improve the pasture management systems through demonstrating:
1. Better pasture options that improve the mixed farming enterprise, and
2. A better understanding of Food
On Offer, including feed budgeting and the use of remote sensing pasture assessment tools to improve overall livestock productivity, enterprise profitability and farm sustainability.

A paddock was split in two, on one half a single species pasture (Vetch only) was sown, on the other side, a mixed species pasture was sown (Vetch/Barley). Sheep grazed the sites for a one month period. Sheep were split into 2 even mobs to graze the treatments. Sheep were weighed on and off the pastures and condition scored.

Biomass, feed tests and satellite imagery data was collected at three timings; pre grazing, post grazing and 1 month recovery. 2022 results showed that although the two treatments showed similar biomass (t/ha), the ewe hoggets on the mixed pasture were able to gain more weight due to higher dry matter content in the vetch/barley mix in comparison to the sole vetch treatment. 

Henderson’s site highlighted the importance of not only pasture biomass, but also pasture quality when identifying stocking rate and duration. This demonstration showed a strong correlation between satellite imagery and biomass measurements taken at the three timings throughout last season.

Therefore, we conclude that with supplementary information (feed tests), it is reasonable to have confidence to make decisions around grazing timing, stocking rate and grazing length using satellite imagery in this scenario. This concept will be further explored and ground truthed during 2023 with the integration of CiboLabs satellite imagery data into Henderson’s AgriWebb App.

Get involved

To find out more contact:

Rachel Trengrove

rachel@unfs.com.au