Back to Prices & Markets

Subscribe to Prices & Markets e-newsletter

For in-depth red meat market news, information and analysis.


Brexit turmoil a risk to Australian red meat

12 December 2018

Prime Minister Theresa May’s postponement of the scheduled vote on the Brexit withdrawal bill in the House of Commons this week has cast further uncertainty around United Kingdom’s (UK) departure from the European Union (EU).

While the Australian government has commenced free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations with the EU and both the UK and Australia have expressed a mutual willingness to pursue an FTA post-Brexit, a disorderly exit poses a range of short-term risks to Australian red meat exports in the interim. Australian exporters and EU-certified producers should be aware of these risks and closely monitor events over coming months when making business decisions.

Australia has two country specific red meat export quotas currently at risk:

  • High Quality Beef (HQB) Hilton quota of 7,150 tonnes with 20% in-quota tariff
  • Australian sheepmeat quota of 19,186 tonnes with 0% in-quota duty.

Australia is a regular high-user of both quotas. Trading outside these quotas attracts a prohibitively high tariff.

Proposal to split quotas form a messy divorce

The EU and the UK have (separately) proposed splitting all country specific tariff rate quotas (TRQ) between the EU and UK following the UK’s departure from the customs union. This proposal would see Australia’s HQB Hilton beef quota split 65% and 35% between the UK and remaining EU respectively, and the sheepmeat quota split 80% and 20%. Further quantitate restrictions between both markets is an erosion of Australia’s access and would have negative implications for Australian exports.

In opposition to the split, the Australian red meat industry has been working closely with the Australian Government to ensure the red meat trade is not collateral damage through this process. In October, the Australian Government submitted its formal objection to the EU and UK through the World Trade Organisation. Despite, in theory, the combined tonnage to the UK and remaining EU-27 remaining unchanged, there is implicit risk in having a fixed split.

Firstly, analysing trade volumes based on port of entry is not the same as identifying where the end-consumer is. Once product has entered the single EU market, whether via Felixstowe (UK), Rotterdam (NL) or another port, it can move freely within the EU. Survey research, conducted by global meat consultancy Gira, of meat importers across the EU found that 10–40% of non-EU imported beef in the UK was re-exported to other EU member states. While difficult to quantify, Australia risks losing flexibility of access to existing customers through the hard split of tariff-rate quotas.

Secondly, under the existing regime, Australia has been able to move product across the single market based on economic conditions in various countries. For instance, over the last decade as the UK pound has depreciated against the euro post-GFC and again post-Brexit vote, Australian beef exports have shifted towards continental Europe due to a relative increase in purchasing power. The UK and remaining EU-27 are both host to an array of short and long-term economic and political risks. The splitting of tariff-rate quotas will mean Australian exporters cannot capitalise on opportunities or mitigate risk by shifting product between the two regions in future.

Thirdly, basing future trading conditions on past relationships is error prone, as the fundamental trade dynamics will also shift concurrently with the separation of tariff-rate quotas. For instance, current trade between the UK and continental Europe will be disrupted without a UK-EU trade deal upon exit. This has the potential to displace roughly 200,000 tonnes of Irish beef currently exported to the UK or 40,000 tonnes of UK sheepmeat destined for France. This prospect creates challenges that cannot be appropriately managed under the proposal to split TRQs.

Australia is not alone and a wide range of commodities across a range of countries could also be implicated in this messy divorce. However, common ground can be found with the majority of countries with tariff-rate quotas adamantly opposed to the apportionment process. Negotiations will be ongoing however a resolution is unlikely to be resolved prior to the 29 March deadline.

Should the UK parliament pass the Brexit deal before the deadline, the UK will remain in the customs union temporarily (or permanently if the hard Irish border cannot be resolved) meaning the existing EU trading regime will remain in place for the time being. However, as time passes and the March Brexit deadline draws ever closer, no Brexit deal will spell an uncertain future for the EU, UK and Australia.

Back to News